"This all adds up to a Teddy Roosevelt pivot-point for Obama," Rich writes, "who shares many of that president’s moral and intellectual convictions. But Obama can’t embrace his inner T.R. as long as he’s too in thrall to the supposed wisdom of the nation’s meritocracy, too willing to settle for incremental pragmatism as a goal, and too inhibited by the fine points of Washington policy debates to embrace bold words and bold action. If he is to wield the big stick of reform against BP and the other powerful interests that have ripped us off, he will have to tell the big story with no holds barred."
The question, however, is whether Obama really has an inner TR to channel. There's been no evidence in his presidency of a true progressive spirit. Just the opposite. He escalated the failed war in Afghanistan and then used the Nobel Peace Prize speech (of all things!) to rationalize that escalation, which perhaps revealed more about his convictions than a controlled and clearly staged hissy-fit about BP's new ad campaign. His announcement at West Point that more troops were going to Afghanistan might have been delivered by W himself.
The healthcare bill turned into a year-long effort to appease the Party of No. Obama unloaded the idea of universal healthcare, a mainstay of his campaign, quicker than an open jump shot. The debate started from the middle and moved ever-rightward.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a47f/9a47f0e4d3491996bde6e03205a010c336061514" alt=""
Unfortunately, Rich is looking for something that isn't there. Obama wants a purple nation not a progressive nation, which oddly is the color of oil on water when the light catches it just right.